SIF design

Choosing the voting: 1oo1, 1oo2, 2oo2, 2oo3 and 1oo3 compared

One table comparing the common architectures for safety, spurious trips, fault tolerance and testing, with guidance on when each is used.

2 min read · First Out AI knowledge library

VotingHFT (safety)Safety (PFDavg)Spurious tripsOnline testing / repairTypical use
1oo10BaselineBaseline (any safe failure trips)Function lost while the device is testedSIL 1, some SIL 2 with good devices and tests
1oo21Much better; common cause dominatesAbout twice 1oo1One channel can be tested, function staysFinal elements (two valves in series), SIL 2–3 sensors where spurious trips are acceptable
2oo20About twice as bad as 1oo1Very lowNot suitable for safety where both must workAvailability-driven functions, not usually for SIL claims
2oo31Close to 1oo2 (slightly worse)Very lowOne channel can be bypassed (becomes 1oo2 or 2oo2 as configured)Transmitters on critical trips
1oo32BestAbout three times 1oo1Two channels remain during a testHigh SIL sensors with low spurious trip cost

Rules of thumb

  • Sensors: 2oo3 is the default for important trips because it combines fault tolerance with a low spurious trip rate and allows online testing.
  • Final elements: 1oo2 (two valves in series, or valve plus motor trip) for SIL 2–3; separate solenoids and air supplies keep β down.
  • Logic solvers: internal redundancy in the certified product rather than voting between products.
  • Always check the degraded mode: what voting applies while one channel is bypassed or failed, and for how long.

In First Out AI

Voting is a drop-down on each group (up to four channels; Free covers 1oo1, 1oo2 and 2oo3). The result shows HFT, the HFT required by IEC 61511 for the target and the spurious trip rate, so architectures can be compared quickly; duplicate the function and change one group to compare side by side.

Written for First Out AI as engineering guidance. It supports engineering work and does not replace it; check every value against your standards, certificates and company rules with a competent functional safety engineer.